n8n vs Zapier vs Make: Automation Platform Comparison 2026
Which workflow automation tool is right for your team: cost, features, and AI capabilities compared
n8n vs Zapier vs Make: Automation Compared (2026)
Short answer: Zapier is the easiest and has the most integrations — best for non-technical users wiring up SaaS apps. Make (formerly Integromat) offers a visual, more powerful flow builder at lower cost, good for complex multi-step scenarios. n8n is open-source and self-hostable, the choice for developers who want control, custom code, and to avoid per-task pricing — and it's increasingly popular for AI workflows. Pick Zapier for simplicity, Make for visual power/value, n8n for open-source control.
At a glance
How they differ
Zapier wins on breadth and simplicity: thousands of app integrations and a trigger→action model anyone can use. It gets pricey as volume grows.
Make gives you a visual canvas for branching, iteration, and data transformation — more power per dollar than Zapier for complex scenarios.
n8n is open-source and self-hostable, so you avoid per-task pricing and gain custom-code nodes and full control over data — a favorite for AI automation pipelines. See the AI-focused walkthrough in AI 办公自动化(n8n/Zapier/Make).
How to choose
FAQ
Which is cheapest? Self-hosted n8n (you pay infra); Make beats Zapier on per-op cost. Which can I self-host? n8n (open-source). Zapier and Make are SaaS only. Which is best for AI workflows? n8n, increasingly — custom nodes + control + no per-task fees.
Verdict
Zapier for the simplest setup and widest app coverage, Make for powerful visual flows at better value, n8n for open-source control and AI-heavy automation without per-task pricing. Match the tool to your technical comfort and how much control (and cost discipline) you need.
*Last updated: June 2026. Verify integrations and pricing on each platform's site.*
Also available in 中文.